rust/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/lib.rs

// tidy-alphabetical-start
#![allow(internal_features)]
#![doc(rust_logo)]
#![feature(box_patterns)]
#![feature(rustdoc_internals)]
#![warn(unreachable_pub)]
// tidy-alphabetical-end

mod helpers;
pub mod pp;
pub mod pprust;
Use `tidy` to sort crate attributes for all compiler crates. We already do this for a number of crates, e.g. `rustc_middle`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_metadata`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_errors`. For the ones we don't, in many cases the attributes are a mess. - There is no consistency about order of attribute kinds (e.g. `allow`/`deny`/`feature`). - Within attribute kind groups (e.g. the `feature` attributes), sometimes the order is alphabetical, and sometimes there is no particular order. - Sometimes the attributes of a particular kind aren't even grouped all together, e.g. there might be a `feature`, then an `allow`, then another `feature`. This commit extends the existing sorting to all compiler crates, increasing consistency. If any new attribute line is added there is now only one place it can go -- no need for arbitrary decisions. Exceptions: - `rustc_log`, `rustc_next_trait_solver` and `rustc_type_ir_macros`, because they have no crate attributes. - `rustc_codegen_gcc`, because it's quasi-external to rustc (e.g. it's ignored in `rustfmt.toml`). 2024-06-12 13:49:36 +10:00			`// tidy-alphabetical-start`
Bump cfg(bootstrap)s 2023-11-13 07:39:17 -05:00			`#![allow(internal_features)]`
			`#![doc(rust_logo)]`
Box the biggest ast::ItemKind variants 2021-01-29 08:31:08 +01:00			`#![feature(box_patterns)]`
Use `tidy` to sort crate attributes for all compiler crates. We already do this for a number of crates, e.g. `rustc_middle`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_metadata`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_errors`. For the ones we don't, in many cases the attributes are a mess. - There is no consistency about order of attribute kinds (e.g. `allow`/`deny`/`feature`). - Within attribute kind groups (e.g. the `feature` attributes), sometimes the order is alphabetical, and sometimes there is no particular order. - Sometimes the attributes of a particular kind aren't even grouped all together, e.g. there might be a `feature`, then an `allow`, then another `feature`. This commit extends the existing sorting to all compiler crates, increasing consistency. If any new attribute line is added there is now only one place it can go -- no need for arbitrary decisions. Exceptions: - `rustc_log`, `rustc_next_trait_solver` and `rustc_type_ir_macros`, because they have no crate attributes. - `rustc_codegen_gcc`, because it's quasi-external to rustc (e.g. it's ignored in `rustfmt.toml`). 2024-06-12 13:49:36 +10:00			`#![feature(rustdoc_internals)]`
Revert "Use workspace lints for crates in `compiler/` #138084" Revert <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138084> to buy time to consider options that avoids breaking downstream usages of cargo on distributed `rustc-src` artifacts, where such cargo invocations fail due to inability to inherit `lints` from workspace root manifest's `workspace.lints` (this is only valid for the source rust-lang/rust workspace, but not really the distributed `rustc-src` artifacts). This breakage was reported in <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138304>. This reverts commit 48caf81484b50dca5a5cebb614899a3df81ca898, reversing changes made to c6662879b27f5161e95f39395e3c9513a7b97028. 2025-03-10 18:12:34 +08:00			`#![warn(unreachable_pub)]`
Use `tidy` to sort crate attributes for all compiler crates. We already do this for a number of crates, e.g. `rustc_middle`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_metadata`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_errors`. For the ones we don't, in many cases the attributes are a mess. - There is no consistency about order of attribute kinds (e.g. `allow`/`deny`/`feature`). - Within attribute kind groups (e.g. the `feature` attributes), sometimes the order is alphabetical, and sometimes there is no particular order. - Sometimes the attributes of a particular kind aren't even grouped all together, e.g. there might be a `feature`, then an `allow`, then another `feature`. This commit extends the existing sorting to all compiler crates, increasing consistency. If any new attribute line is added there is now only one place it can go -- no need for arbitrary decisions. Exceptions: - `rustc_log`, `rustc_next_trait_solver` and `rustc_type_ir_macros`, because they have no crate attributes. - `rustc_codegen_gcc`, because it's quasi-external to rustc (e.g. it's ignored in `rustfmt.toml`). 2024-06-12 13:49:36 +10:00			`// tidy-alphabetical-end`
syntax::print -> new crate rustc_ast_pretty 2020-01-11 17:02:46 +01:00
			`mod helpers;`
			`pub mod pp;`
			`pub mod pprust;`