rust/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/region_constraints/mod.rs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

739 lines
25 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
//! See `README.md`.
use std::ops::Range;
2024-03-07 15:39:30 +01:00
use std::{cmp, fmt, mem};
2023-01-27 17:22:05 +03:00
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
use rustc_data_structures::undo_log::UndoLogs;
use rustc_data_structures::unify as ut;
use rustc_index::IndexVec;
use rustc_macros::{TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable};
2020-03-29 17:19:48 +02:00
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, ReBound, ReStatic, ReVar, Region, RegionVid, Ty, TyCtxt};
use rustc_middle::{bug, span_bug};
use tracing::{debug, instrument};
use self::CombineMapType::*;
2019-03-25 22:26:37 +00:00
use self::UndoLog::*;
2019-05-31 15:09:04 +09:00
use super::{MiscVariable, RegionVariableOrigin, Rollback, SubregionOrigin};
2024-03-07 15:39:30 +01:00
use crate::infer::snapshot::undo_log::{InferCtxtUndoLogs, Snapshot};
use crate::infer::unify_key::{RegionVariableValue, RegionVidKey};
2012-09-04 11:54:36 -07:00
2019-02-20 05:39:04 -05:00
mod leak_check;
#[derive(Clone, Default)]
pub struct RegionConstraintStorage<'tcx> {
/// For each `RegionVid`, the corresponding `RegionVariableOrigin`.
pub(super) var_infos: IndexVec<RegionVid, RegionVariableInfo>,
pub(super) data: RegionConstraintData<'tcx>,
/// For a given pair of regions (R1, R2), maps to a region R3 that
/// is designated as their LUB (edges R1 <= R3 and R2 <= R3
/// exist). This prevents us from making many such regions.
lubs: CombineMap<'tcx>,
/// For a given pair of regions (R1, R2), maps to a region R3 that
/// is designated as their GLB (edges R3 <= R1 and R3 <= R2
/// exist). This prevents us from making many such regions.
glbs: CombineMap<'tcx>,
/// When we add a R1 == R2 constraint, we currently add (a) edges
/// R1 <= R2 and R2 <= R1 and (b) we unify the two regions in this
2021-05-15 12:26:50 -04:00
/// table. You can then call `opportunistic_resolve_var` early
/// which will map R1 and R2 to some common region (i.e., either
/// R1 or R2). This is important when fulfillment, dropck and other such
/// code is iterating to a fixed point, because otherwise we sometimes
/// would wind up with a fresh stream of region variables that have been
/// equated but appear distinct.
pub(super) unification_table: ut::UnificationTableStorage<RegionVidKey<'tcx>>,
/// a flag set to true when we perform any unifications; this is used
/// to micro-optimize `take_and_reset_data`
any_unifications: bool,
}
pub struct RegionConstraintCollector<'a, 'tcx> {
storage: &'a mut RegionConstraintStorage<'tcx>,
undo_log: &'a mut InferCtxtUndoLogs<'tcx>,
}
pub type VarInfos = IndexVec<RegionVid, RegionVariableInfo>;
/// The full set of region constraints gathered up by the collector.
/// Describes constraints between the region variables and other
/// regions, as well as other conditions that must be verified, or
/// assumptions that can be made.
Generate documentation for auto-trait impls A new section is added to both both struct and trait doc pages. On struct/enum pages, a new 'Auto Trait Implementations' section displays any synthetic implementations for auto traits. Currently, this is only done for Send and Sync. On trait pages, a new 'Auto Implementors' section displays all types which automatically implement the trait. Effectively, this is a list of all public types in the standard library. Synthesized impls for a particular auto trait ('synthetic impls') take into account generic bounds. For example, a type 'struct Foo<T>(T)' will have 'impl<T> Send for Foo<T> where T: Send' generated for it. Manual implementations of auto traits are also taken into account. If we have the following types: 'struct Foo<T>(T)' 'struct Wrapper<T>(Foo<T>)' 'unsafe impl<T> Send for Wrapper<T>' // pretend that Wrapper<T> makes this sound somehow Then Wrapper will have the following impl generated: 'impl<T> Send for Wrapper<T>' reflecting the fact that 'T: Send' need not hold for 'Wrapper<T>: Send' to hold Lifetimes, HRTBS, and projections (e.g. '<T as Iterator>::Item') are taken into account by synthetic impls However, if a type can *never* implement a particular auto trait (e.g. 'struct MyStruct<T>(*const T)'), then a negative impl will be generated (in this case, 'impl<T> !Send for MyStruct<T>') All of this means that a user should be able to copy-paste a synthetic impl into their code, without any observable changes in behavior (assuming the rest of the program remains unchanged).
2017-11-22 16:16:55 -05:00
#[derive(Debug, Default, Clone)]
pub struct RegionConstraintData<'tcx> {
/// Constraints of the form `A <= B`, where either `A` or `B` can
/// be a region variable (or neither, as it happens).
2023-12-11 13:03:35 +00:00
pub constraints: Vec<(Constraint<'tcx>, SubregionOrigin<'tcx>)>,
/// A "verify" is something that we need to verify after inference
/// is done, but which does not directly affect inference in any
/// way.
///
/// An example is a `A <= B` where neither `A` nor `B` are
/// inference variables.
pub verifys: Vec<Verify<'tcx>>,
}
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// Represents a constraint that influences the inference process.
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Debug, Hash)]
pub enum Constraint<'tcx> {
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// A region variable is a subregion of another.
VarSubVar(RegionVid, RegionVid),
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// A concrete region is a subregion of region variable.
RegSubVar(Region<'tcx>, RegionVid),
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// A region variable is a subregion of a concrete region. This does not
/// directly affect inference, but instead is checked after
/// inference is complete.
VarSubReg(RegionVid, Region<'tcx>),
/// A constraint where neither side is a variable. This does not
/// directly affect inference, but instead is checked after
/// inference is complete.
RegSubReg(Region<'tcx>, Region<'tcx>),
}
impl Constraint<'_> {
pub fn involves_placeholders(&self) -> bool {
match self {
Constraint::VarSubVar(_, _) => false,
Constraint::VarSubReg(_, r) | Constraint::RegSubVar(r, _) => r.is_placeholder(),
Constraint::RegSubReg(r, s) => r.is_placeholder() || s.is_placeholder(),
}
}
}
Generate documentation for auto-trait impls A new section is added to both both struct and trait doc pages. On struct/enum pages, a new 'Auto Trait Implementations' section displays any synthetic implementations for auto traits. Currently, this is only done for Send and Sync. On trait pages, a new 'Auto Implementors' section displays all types which automatically implement the trait. Effectively, this is a list of all public types in the standard library. Synthesized impls for a particular auto trait ('synthetic impls') take into account generic bounds. For example, a type 'struct Foo<T>(T)' will have 'impl<T> Send for Foo<T> where T: Send' generated for it. Manual implementations of auto traits are also taken into account. If we have the following types: 'struct Foo<T>(T)' 'struct Wrapper<T>(Foo<T>)' 'unsafe impl<T> Send for Wrapper<T>' // pretend that Wrapper<T> makes this sound somehow Then Wrapper will have the following impl generated: 'impl<T> Send for Wrapper<T>' reflecting the fact that 'T: Send' need not hold for 'Wrapper<T>: Send' to hold Lifetimes, HRTBS, and projections (e.g. '<T as Iterator>::Item') are taken into account by synthetic impls However, if a type can *never* implement a particular auto trait (e.g. 'struct MyStruct<T>(*const T)'), then a negative impl will be generated (in this case, 'impl<T> !Send for MyStruct<T>') All of this means that a user should be able to copy-paste a synthetic impl into their code, without any observable changes in behavior (assuming the rest of the program remains unchanged).
2017-11-22 16:16:55 -05:00
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct Verify<'tcx> {
pub kind: GenericKind<'tcx>,
pub origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
pub region: Region<'tcx>,
pub bound: VerifyBound<'tcx>,
}
2022-06-17 10:53:29 +01:00
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub enum GenericKind<'tcx> {
Param(ty::ParamTy),
Placeholder(ty::PlaceholderType),
Alias(ty::AliasTy<'tcx>),
}
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// Describes the things that some `GenericKind` value `G` is known to
/// outlive. Each variant of `VerifyBound` can be thought of as a
/// function:
2022-04-15 15:04:34 -07:00
/// ```ignore (pseudo-rust)
/// fn(min: Region) -> bool { .. }
/// ```
/// where `true` means that the region `min` meets that `G: min`.
/// (False means nothing.)
///
/// So, for example, if we have the type `T` and we have in scope that
/// `T: 'a` and `T: 'b`, then the verify bound might be:
2022-04-15 15:04:34 -07:00
/// ```ignore (pseudo-rust)
/// fn(min: Region) -> bool {
/// ('a: min) || ('b: min)
/// }
/// ```
2021-08-22 14:46:15 +02:00
/// This is described with an `AnyRegion('a, 'b)` node.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub enum VerifyBound<'tcx> {
2022-06-23 16:38:24 -04:00
/// See [`VerifyIfEq`] docs
2022-06-23 16:35:47 -04:00
IfEq(ty::Binder<'tcx, VerifyIfEq<'tcx>>),
2022-06-15 05:55:05 -04:00
/// Given a region `R`, expands to the function:
///
2022-04-15 15:04:34 -07:00
/// ```ignore (pseudo-rust)
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// fn(min) -> bool {
/// R: min
/// }
/// ```
///
/// This is used when we can establish that `G: R` -- therefore,
/// if `R: min`, then by transitivity `G: min`.
OutlivedBy(Region<'tcx>),
/// Given a region `R`, true if it is `'empty`.
IsEmpty,
/// Given a set of bounds `B`, expands to the function:
///
2022-04-15 15:04:34 -07:00
/// ```ignore (pseudo-rust)
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// fn(min) -> bool {
/// exists (b in B) { b(min) }
/// }
/// ```
///
/// In other words, if we meet some bound in `B`, that suffices.
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// This is used when all the bounds in `B` are known to apply to `G`.
AnyBound(Vec<VerifyBound<'tcx>>),
/// Given a set of bounds `B`, expands to the function:
///
2022-04-15 15:04:34 -07:00
/// ```ignore (pseudo-rust)
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// fn(min) -> bool {
/// forall (b in B) { b(min) }
/// }
/// ```
///
/// In other words, if we meet *all* bounds in `B`, that suffices.
/// This is used when *some* bound in `B` is known to suffice, but
/// we don't know which.
AllBounds(Vec<VerifyBound<'tcx>>),
}
2022-06-23 16:38:24 -04:00
/// This is a "conditional bound" that checks the result of inference
/// and supplies a bound if it ended up being relevant. It's used in situations
/// like this:
2022-06-15 05:55:05 -04:00
///
/// ```rust,ignore (pseudo-Rust)
2022-06-23 16:38:24 -04:00
/// fn foo<'a, 'b, T: SomeTrait<'a>>
/// where
/// <T as SomeTrait<'a>>::Item: 'b
2022-06-15 05:55:05 -04:00
/// ```
///
2022-06-23 16:38:24 -04:00
/// If we have an obligation like `<T as SomeTrait<'?x>>::Item: 'c`, then
/// we don't know yet whether it suffices to show that `'b: 'c`. If `'?x` winds
/// up being equal to `'a`, then the where-clauses on function applies, and
/// in that case we can show `'b: 'c`. But if `'?x` winds up being something
/// else, the bound isn't relevant.
2022-06-15 05:55:05 -04:00
///
/// In the [`VerifyBound`], this struct is enclosed in `Binder` to account
2022-06-23 16:38:24 -04:00
/// for cases like
2022-06-15 05:55:05 -04:00
///
/// ```rust,ignore (pseudo-Rust)
2022-06-23 16:38:24 -04:00
/// where for<'a> <T as SomeTrait<'a>::Item: 'a
2022-06-15 05:55:05 -04:00
/// ```
///
2022-06-23 16:38:24 -04:00
/// The idea is that we have to find some instantiation of `'a` that can
/// make `<T as SomeTrait<'a>>::Item` equal to the final value of `G`,
/// the generic we are checking.
///
/// ```ignore (pseudo-rust)
/// fn(min) -> bool {
/// exists<'a> {
/// if G == K {
/// B(min)
/// } else {
/// false
/// }
/// }
/// }
/// ```
2022-06-17 10:53:29 +01:00
#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
2022-06-15 05:55:05 -04:00
pub struct VerifyIfEq<'tcx> {
/// Type which must match the generic `G`
pub ty: Ty<'tcx>,
/// Bound that applies if `ty` is equal.
pub bound: Region<'tcx>,
}
2015-03-30 09:38:44 -04:00
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
pub(crate) struct TwoRegions<'tcx> {
a: Region<'tcx>,
b: Region<'tcx>,
}
2015-03-30 09:38:44 -04:00
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq)]
pub(crate) enum UndoLog<'tcx> {
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// We added `RegionVid`.
2012-09-07 07:37:19 -07:00
AddVar(RegionVid),
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// We added the given `constraint`.
2023-12-11 13:03:35 +00:00
AddConstraint(usize),
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// We added the given `verify`.
AddVerify(usize),
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// We added a GLB/LUB "combination variable".
AddCombination(CombineMapType, TwoRegions<'tcx>),
}
2015-03-30 09:38:44 -04:00
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq)]
pub(crate) enum CombineMapType {
2015-10-31 11:31:52 +01:00
Lub,
Glb,
2013-03-22 22:26:41 -04:00
}
type CombineMap<'tcx> = FxHashMap<TwoRegions<'tcx>, RegionVid>;
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy)]
pub struct RegionVariableInfo {
pub origin: RegionVariableOrigin,
// FIXME: This is only necessary for `fn take_and_reset_data` and
// `lexical_region_resolve`. We should rework `lexical_region_resolve`
// in the near/medium future anyways and could move the unverse info
// for `fn take_and_reset_data` into a separate table which is
// only populated when needed.
//
// For both of these cases it is fine that this can diverge from the
// actual universe of the variable, which is directly stored in the
// unification table for unknown region variables. At some point we could
// stop emitting bidirectional outlives constraints if equate succeeds.
// This would be currently unsound as it would cause us to drop the universe
// changes in `lexical_region_resolve`.
2018-02-07 12:22:47 -07:00
pub universe: ty::UniverseIndex,
}
pub(crate) struct RegionSnapshot {
any_unifications: bool,
}
impl<'tcx> RegionConstraintStorage<'tcx> {
#[inline]
pub(crate) fn with_log<'a>(
&'a mut self,
undo_log: &'a mut InferCtxtUndoLogs<'tcx>,
) -> RegionConstraintCollector<'a, 'tcx> {
RegionConstraintCollector { storage: self, undo_log }
}
}
impl<'tcx> RegionConstraintCollector<'_, 'tcx> {
pub fn num_region_vars(&self) -> usize {
self.storage.var_infos.len()
}
/// Takes (and clears) the current set of constraints. Note that
/// the set of variables remains intact, but all relationships
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// between them are reset. This is used during NLL checking to
/// grab the set of constraints that arose from a particular
/// operation.
///
/// We don't want to leak relationships between variables between
/// points because just because (say) `r1 == r2` was true at some
/// point P in the graph doesn't imply that it will be true at
/// some other point Q, in NLL.
///
/// Not legal during a snapshot.
pub fn take_and_reset_data(&mut self) -> RegionConstraintData<'tcx> {
2024-03-07 15:39:30 +01:00
assert!(!UndoLogs::<UndoLog<'_>>::in_snapshot(&self.undo_log));
// If you add a new field to `RegionConstraintCollector`, you
// should think carefully about whether it needs to be cleared
// or updated in some way.
let RegionConstraintStorage {
var_infos: _,
data,
lubs,
glbs,
unification_table: _,
any_unifications,
} = self.storage;
// Clear the tables of (lubs, glbs), so that we will create
// fresh regions if we do a LUB operation. As it happens,
// LUB/GLB are not performed by the MIR type-checker, which is
// the one that uses this method, but it's good to be correct.
lubs.clear();
glbs.clear();
let data = mem::take(data);
// Clear all unifications and recreate the variables a "now
// un-unified" state. Note that when we unify `a` and `b`, we
// also insert `a <= b` and a `b <= a` edges, so the
// `RegionConstraintData` contains the relationship here.
if *any_unifications {
*any_unifications = false;
// Manually inlined `self.unification_table_mut()` as `self` is used in the closure.
ut::UnificationTable::with_log(&mut self.storage.unification_table, &mut self.undo_log)
.reset_unifications(|key| RegionVariableValue::Unknown {
universe: self.storage.var_infos[key.vid].universe,
});
}
data
}
pub fn data(&self) -> &RegionConstraintData<'tcx> {
&self.storage.data
}
2024-10-03 14:33:28 +10:00
pub(super) fn start_snapshot(&self) -> RegionSnapshot {
debug!("RegionConstraintCollector: start_snapshot");
RegionSnapshot { any_unifications: self.storage.any_unifications }
}
2022-06-26 18:57:46 -04:00
pub(super) fn rollback_to(&mut self, snapshot: RegionSnapshot) {
debug!("RegionConstraintCollector: rollback_to({:?})", snapshot);
self.storage.any_unifications = snapshot.any_unifications;
}
2022-06-26 18:57:46 -04:00
pub(super) fn new_region_var(
&mut self,
universe: ty::UniverseIndex,
origin: RegionVariableOrigin,
) -> RegionVid {
let vid = self.storage.var_infos.push(RegionVariableInfo { origin, universe });
let u_vid = self.unification_table_mut().new_key(RegionVariableValue::Unknown { universe });
assert_eq!(vid, u_vid.vid);
self.undo_log.push(AddVar(vid));
debug!("created new region variable {:?} in {:?} with origin {:?}", vid, universe, origin);
vid
}
/// Returns the origin for the given variable.
2022-06-26 18:57:46 -04:00
pub(super) fn var_origin(&self, vid: RegionVid) -> RegionVariableOrigin {
self.storage.var_infos[vid].origin
}
fn add_constraint(&mut self, constraint: Constraint<'tcx>, origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>) {
// cannot add constraints once regions are resolved
debug!("RegionConstraintCollector: add_constraint({:?})", constraint);
2023-12-11 13:03:35 +00:00
let index = self.storage.data.constraints.len();
self.storage.data.constraints.push((constraint, origin));
self.undo_log.push(AddConstraint(index));
}
fn add_verify(&mut self, verify: Verify<'tcx>) {
// cannot add verifys once regions are resolved
debug!("RegionConstraintCollector: add_verify({:?})", verify);
// skip no-op cases known to be satisfied
2022-03-02 16:02:37 -03:00
if let VerifyBound::AllBounds(ref bs) = verify.bound
&& bs.is_empty()
{
return;
}
let index = self.storage.data.verifys.len();
self.storage.data.verifys.push(verify);
self.undo_log.push(AddVerify(index));
}
2022-06-26 18:57:46 -04:00
pub(super) fn make_eqregion(
&mut self,
2017-11-05 05:52:59 -05:00
origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
a: Region<'tcx>,
b: Region<'tcx>,
2017-11-05 05:52:59 -05:00
) {
if a != b {
// Eventually, it would be nice to add direct support for
// equating regions.
self.make_subregion(origin.clone(), a, b);
self.make_subregion(origin, b, a);
match (a.kind(), b.kind()) {
(ty::ReVar(a), ty::ReVar(b)) => {
debug!("make_eqregion: unifying {:?} with {:?}", a, b);
if self.unification_table_mut().unify_var_var(a, b).is_ok() {
self.storage.any_unifications = true;
}
}
(ty::ReVar(vid), _) => {
debug!("make_eqregion: unifying {:?} with {:?}", vid, b);
if self
.unification_table_mut()
.unify_var_value(vid, RegionVariableValue::Known { value: b })
.is_ok()
{
self.storage.any_unifications = true;
};
}
(_, ty::ReVar(vid)) => {
debug!("make_eqregion: unifying {:?} with {:?}", a, vid);
if self
.unification_table_mut()
.unify_var_value(vid, RegionVariableValue::Known { value: a })
.is_ok()
{
self.storage.any_unifications = true;
};
}
(_, _) => {}
}
}
}
2021-08-20 13:36:04 +00:00
#[instrument(skip(self, origin), level = "debug")]
2022-06-26 18:57:46 -04:00
pub(super) fn make_subregion(
&mut self,
2017-11-05 05:52:59 -05:00
origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
sub: Region<'tcx>,
sup: Region<'tcx>,
) {
// cannot add constraints once regions are resolved
2021-08-20 13:36:04 +00:00
debug!("origin = {:#?}", origin);
match (sub.kind(), sup.kind()) {
(ReBound(..), _) | (_, ReBound(..)) => {
2017-11-05 05:52:59 -05:00
span_bug!(origin.span(), "cannot relate bound region: {:?} <= {:?}", sub, sup);
2015-10-31 11:31:52 +01:00
}
(_, ReStatic) => {
2015-10-31 11:31:52 +01:00
// all regions are subregions of static, so we can ignore this
}
(ReVar(sub_id), ReVar(sup_id)) => {
self.add_constraint(Constraint::VarSubVar(sub_id, sup_id), origin);
2015-10-31 11:31:52 +01:00
}
(_, ReVar(sup_id)) => {
self.add_constraint(Constraint::RegSubVar(sub, sup_id), origin);
2015-10-31 11:31:52 +01:00
}
(ReVar(sub_id), _) => {
self.add_constraint(Constraint::VarSubReg(sub_id, sup), origin);
2015-10-31 11:31:52 +01:00
}
_ => {
self.add_constraint(Constraint::RegSubReg(sub, sup), origin);
2015-10-31 11:31:52 +01:00
}
}
}
2022-06-26 18:57:46 -04:00
pub(super) fn verify_generic_bound(
&mut self,
2017-11-05 05:52:59 -05:00
origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
kind: GenericKind<'tcx>,
sub: Region<'tcx>,
bound: VerifyBound<'tcx>,
) {
self.add_verify(Verify { kind, origin, region: sub, bound });
}
2022-06-26 18:57:46 -04:00
pub(super) fn lub_regions(
&mut self,
2019-06-14 00:48:52 +03:00
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
2017-11-05 05:52:59 -05:00
origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
a: Region<'tcx>,
b: Region<'tcx>,
) -> Region<'tcx> {
// cannot add constraints once regions are resolved
debug!("RegionConstraintCollector: lub_regions({:?}, {:?})", a, b);
if a.is_static() || b.is_static() {
a // nothing lives longer than static
} else if a == b {
a // LUB(a,a) = a
} else {
self.combine_vars(tcx, Lub, a, b, origin)
}
}
2022-06-26 18:57:46 -04:00
pub(super) fn glb_regions(
&mut self,
2019-06-14 00:48:52 +03:00
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
2017-11-05 05:52:59 -05:00
origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
a: Region<'tcx>,
b: Region<'tcx>,
) -> Region<'tcx> {
// cannot add constraints once regions are resolved
debug!("RegionConstraintCollector: glb_regions({:?}, {:?})", a, b);
if a.is_static() {
b // static lives longer than everything else
} else if b.is_static() {
a // static lives longer than everything else
} else if a == b {
a // GLB(a,a) = a
} else {
self.combine_vars(tcx, Glb, a, b, origin)
}
}
/// Resolves a region var to its value in the unification table, if it exists.
/// Otherwise, it is resolved to the root `ReVar` in the table.
pub fn opportunistic_resolve_var(
&mut self,
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
vid: ty::RegionVid,
) -> ty::Region<'tcx> {
let mut ut = self.unification_table_mut();
let root_vid = ut.find(vid).vid;
match ut.probe_value(root_vid) {
RegionVariableValue::Known { value } => value,
RegionVariableValue::Unknown { .. } => ty::Region::new_var(tcx, root_vid),
}
}
pub fn probe_value(
&mut self,
vid: ty::RegionVid,
) -> Result<ty::Region<'tcx>, ty::UniverseIndex> {
match self.unification_table_mut().probe_value(vid) {
RegionVariableValue::Known { value } => Ok(value),
RegionVariableValue::Unknown { universe } => Err(universe),
}
}
fn combine_map(&mut self, t: CombineMapType) -> &mut CombineMap<'tcx> {
match t {
Glb => &mut self.storage.glbs,
Lub => &mut self.storage.lubs,
}
}
fn combine_vars(
&mut self,
2019-06-14 00:48:52 +03:00
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
2017-11-05 05:52:59 -05:00
t: CombineMapType,
a: Region<'tcx>,
b: Region<'tcx>,
origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
) -> Region<'tcx> {
let vars = TwoRegions { a, b };
if let Some(&c) = self.combine_map(t).get(&vars) {
return ty::Region::new_var(tcx, c);
2013-03-22 22:26:41 -04:00
}
2018-02-07 12:22:47 -07:00
let a_universe = self.universe(a);
let b_universe = self.universe(b);
let c_universe = cmp::max(a_universe, b_universe);
let c = self.new_region_var(c_universe, MiscVariable(origin.span()));
self.combine_map(t).insert(vars, c);
self.undo_log.push(AddCombination(t, vars));
let new_r = ty::Region::new_var(tcx, c);
for old_r in [a, b] {
match t {
Glb => self.make_subregion(origin.clone(), new_r, old_r),
Lub => self.make_subregion(origin.clone(), old_r, new_r),
}
}
debug!("combine_vars() c={:?}", c);
new_r
}
pub fn universe(&mut self, region: Region<'tcx>) -> ty::UniverseIndex {
match region.kind() {
2023-02-07 14:55:16 +00:00
ty::ReStatic
| ty::ReErased
| ty::ReLateParam(..)
| ty::ReEarlyParam(..)
2023-02-07 14:55:16 +00:00
| ty::ReError(_) => ty::UniverseIndex::ROOT,
ty::RePlaceholder(placeholder) => placeholder.universe,
ty::ReVar(vid) => match self.probe_value(vid) {
Ok(value) => self.universe(value),
Err(universe) => universe,
},
ty::ReBound(..) => bug!("universe(): encountered bound region {:?}", region),
2018-02-07 12:22:47 -07:00
}
}
pub fn vars_since_snapshot(
&self,
value_count: usize,
2019-03-25 22:26:37 +00:00
) -> (Range<RegionVid>, Vec<RegionVariableOrigin>) {
let range =
RegionVid::from(value_count)..RegionVid::from(self.storage.unification_table.len());
2019-03-25 22:26:37 +00:00
(
range.clone(),
(range.start..range.end).map(|index| self.storage.var_infos[index].origin).collect(),
2019-03-25 22:26:37 +00:00
)
}
2020-05-14 00:08:00 +02:00
/// See `InferCtxt::region_constraints_added_in_snapshot`.
pub fn region_constraints_added_in_snapshot(&self, mark: &Snapshot<'tcx>) -> bool {
self.undo_log
.region_constraints_in_snapshot(mark)
.any(|&elt| matches!(elt, AddConstraint(_)))
}
#[inline]
fn unification_table_mut(&mut self) -> super::UnificationTable<'_, 'tcx, RegionVidKey<'tcx>> {
ut::UnificationTable::with_log(&mut self.storage.unification_table, self.undo_log)
}
}
impl fmt::Debug for RegionSnapshot {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
write!(f, "RegionSnapshot")
}
}
impl<'tcx> fmt::Debug for GenericKind<'tcx> {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
match *self {
GenericKind::Param(ref p) => write!(f, "{p:?}"),
GenericKind::Placeholder(ref p) => write!(f, "{p:?}"),
GenericKind::Alias(ref p) => write!(f, "{p:?}"),
}
}
}
impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for GenericKind<'tcx> {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
match *self {
GenericKind::Param(ref p) => write!(f, "{p}"),
GenericKind::Placeholder(ref p) => write!(f, "{p:?}"),
GenericKind::Alias(ref p) => write!(f, "{p}"),
}
}
}
2019-06-14 00:48:52 +03:00
impl<'tcx> GenericKind<'tcx> {
pub fn to_ty(&self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
match *self {
2015-10-31 11:31:52 +01:00
GenericKind::Param(ref p) => p.to_ty(tcx),
GenericKind::Placeholder(ref p) => Ty::new_placeholder(tcx, *p),
GenericKind::Alias(ref p) => p.to_ty(tcx),
}
}
}
2019-06-11 12:21:38 +03:00
impl<'tcx> VerifyBound<'tcx> {
pub fn must_hold(&self) -> bool {
match self {
2022-06-23 16:35:47 -04:00
VerifyBound::IfEq(..) => false,
VerifyBound::OutlivedBy(re) => re.is_static(),
VerifyBound::IsEmpty => false,
VerifyBound::AnyBound(bs) => bs.iter().any(|b| b.must_hold()),
VerifyBound::AllBounds(bs) => bs.iter().all(|b| b.must_hold()),
}
}
pub fn cannot_hold(&self) -> bool {
match self {
2022-06-23 16:35:47 -04:00
VerifyBound::IfEq(..) => false,
VerifyBound::IsEmpty => false,
VerifyBound::OutlivedBy(_) => false,
VerifyBound::AnyBound(bs) => bs.iter().all(|b| b.cannot_hold()),
VerifyBound::AllBounds(bs) => bs.iter().any(|b| b.cannot_hold()),
}
}
pub fn or(self, vb: VerifyBound<'tcx>) -> VerifyBound<'tcx> {
if self.must_hold() || vb.cannot_hold() {
self
} else if self.cannot_hold() || vb.must_hold() {
vb
} else {
VerifyBound::AnyBound(vec![self, vb])
}
}
}
impl<'tcx> RegionConstraintData<'tcx> {
2019-02-08 14:53:55 +01:00
/// Returns `true` if this region constraint data contains no constraints, and `false`
/// otherwise.
pub fn is_empty(&self) -> bool {
2024-12-19 10:08:05 +01:00
let RegionConstraintData { constraints, verifys } = self;
constraints.is_empty() && verifys.is_empty()
}
}
impl<'tcx> Rollback<UndoLog<'tcx>> for RegionConstraintStorage<'tcx> {
fn reverse(&mut self, undo: UndoLog<'tcx>) {
match undo {
AddVar(vid) => {
self.var_infos.pop().unwrap();
assert_eq!(self.var_infos.len(), vid.index());
}
AddConstraint(index) => {
self.data.constraints.pop().unwrap();
assert_eq!(self.data.constraints.len(), index);
}
AddVerify(index) => {
self.data.verifys.pop();
assert_eq!(self.data.verifys.len(), index);
}
AddCombination(Glb, ref regions) => {
self.glbs.remove(regions);
}
AddCombination(Lub, ref regions) => {
self.lubs.remove(regions);
}
}
}
}