bjoernager/forgejo
bjoernager/forgejo
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity

Adjust codespell config + make it fix few typos which sneaked in since addition of codespell support (#4857)

Browse source 
Now that my colleague just posted a wonderful blog post https://blog.datalad.org/posts/forgejo-runner-podman-deployment/ on forgejo runner, some time I will try to add that damn codespell action to work on CI here ;)  meanwhile some typos managed to sneak in and this PR should address them (one change might be functional in a test -- not sure if would cause a fail or not)

### Release notes

- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4857
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
This commit is contained in:
Yaroslav Halchenko 2024-08-08 16:07:35 +00:00 • committed by Earl Warren
parent 06d25815d3
commit 5ae2dbcb14
19 changed files with 25 additions and 25 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
RELEASE-NOTES.md
View file

@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ A [companion blog post](https://forgejo.org/2024-07-release-v8-0/) provides addi
- feat: add [Reviewed-on and Reviewed-by variables](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/4ddd9af50fbfcfb2ebf629697a803b3bce56c4af) to the merge template.
- feat(perf): [add the `[ui.csv].MAX_ROWS` setting](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/433b6c6910f8699dc41787ef8f5148b122b4677e) to avoid displaying a large number of lines (defaults to 2500).
- feat: [add a setting to override or add headers of all outgoing emails](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/1d4bff4f65d5e4a3969871ef91d3612daf272b45), for instance `Reply-To` or `In-Reply-To`.<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4027): <!--number 4027 --><!--number--><!--description - Gitea/Forgejo webhook payload include additional fields (`html_url`, `additions`, `deletions`, `review_comments`...) for better compatbility with [OpenProject](https://www.openproject.org/), ported from [gitea#28435](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28435).-->the Gitea/Forgejo webhook payload includes additional fields (`html_url`, `additions`, `deletions`, `review_comments`...) for better compatbility with [OpenProject](https://www.openproject.org/).<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4027): <!--number 4027 --><!--number--><!--description - Gitea/Forgejo webhook payload include additional fields (`html_url`, `additions`, `deletions`, `review_comments`...) for better compatibility with [OpenProject](https://www.openproject.org/), ported from [gitea#28435](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28435).-->the Gitea/Forgejo webhook payload includes additional fields (`html_url`, `additions`, `deletions`, `review_comments`...) for better compatibility with [OpenProject](https://www.openproject.org/).<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4026): <!--number 4026 --><!--number--><!--description - when an OAuth grant request submitted to a Forgejo user is denied, the server from which the request originates is not notified that it has been denied-->when an OAuth grant request submitted to a Forgejo user is denied, the server from which the request originates is notified that it has been denied.<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3989): <!--number 3989 --><!--number--><!--description multine placeholder-->
- feat: API endpoints that return a repository now [also include the topics](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/ee2247d77c0b13b0b45df704d7589b541db03899).
@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ A [companion blog post](https://forgejo.org/2024-07-release-v8-0/) provides addi
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3724): <!--number 3724 --><!--number--><!--description multine placeholder-->
- [CERT management was improved](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3724) when [`ENABLE_ACME=true`](https://forgejo.org/docs/v7.0/admin/config-cheat-sheet/#server-server)
- Draft support for draft-03 of [ACME Renewal Information (ARI)](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-ari/) which assists with deciding when to renew certificates. This augments CertMagic's already-advanced logic using cert lifetime and OCSP/revocation status.
- New [`ZeroSSLIssuer`](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/caddyserver/certmagic@v0.21.0#ZeroSSLIssuer) uses the [ZeroSSL API](https://zerossl.com/documentation/api/) to get certificates. ZeroSSL also has an ACME endpoint, which can still be accesed using the existing ACMEIssuer, as always. Their proprietary API is paid, but has extra features like IP certificates, better reliability, and support.
- New [`ZeroSSLIssuer`](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/caddyserver/certmagic@v0.21.0#ZeroSSLIssuer) uses the [ZeroSSL API](https://zerossl.com/documentation/api/) to get certificates. ZeroSSL also has an ACME endpoint, which can still be accessed using the existing ACMEIssuer, as always. Their proprietary API is paid, but has extra features like IP certificates, better reliability, and support.
- DNS challenges should be smoother in some cases as we've improved propagation checking.
- In the odd case your ACME account disappears from the ACME server, CertMagic will automatically retry with a new account. (This happens in some test/dev environments.)
- ACME accounts are identified only by their public keys, but CertMagic maps accounts by CA+email for practical/storage reasons. So now you can "pin" an account key to use by specifying your email and the account public key in your config, which is useful if you need to absolutely be sure to use a specific account (like if you get rate limit exemptions from a CA).<!--description-->
@ -2219,7 +2219,7 @@ This stable release includes a security fix for `git` and bug fixes.
### Git
Git [recently announced](https://github.blog/2023-02-14-git-security-vulnerabilities-announced-3/) new versions to address two CVEs ([CVE-2023-22490](https://cve.circl.lu/cve/CVE-2023-22490), [CVE-2023-23946](https://cve.circl.lu/cve/CVE-2023-23946)). On 14 Februrary 2023, Git published the maintenance release v2.39.2, together with releases for older maintenance tracks v2.38.4, v2.37.6, v2.36.5, v2.35.7, v2.34.7, v2.33.7, v2.32.6, v2.31.7, and v2.30.8. All major GNU/Linux distributions also provide updated packages via their security update channels.
Git [recently announced](https://github.blog/2023-02-14-git-security-vulnerabilities-announced-3/) new versions to address two CVEs ([CVE-2023-22490](https://cve.circl.lu/cve/CVE-2023-22490), [CVE-2023-23946](https://cve.circl.lu/cve/CVE-2023-23946)). On 14 February 2023, Git published the maintenance release v2.39.2, together with releases for older maintenance tracks v2.38.4, v2.37.6, v2.36.5, v2.35.7, v2.34.7, v2.33.7, v2.32.6, v2.31.7, and v2.30.8. All major GNU/Linux distributions also provide updated packages via their security update channels.
We recommend that all installations running a version affected by the issues described below are upgraded to the latest version as soon as possible.