//! Checking that constant values used in types can be successfully evaluated.
//!
//! For concrete constants, this is fairly simple as we can just try and evaluate it.
//!
//! When dealing with polymorphic constants, for example `std::mem::size_of::<T>() - 1`,
//! this is not as easy.
//!
//! In this case we try to build an abstract representation of this constant using
//! `mir_abstract_const` which can then be checked for structural equality with other
//! generic constants mentioned in the `caller_bounds` of the current environment.
use rustc_errors::ErrorReported;
use rustc_hir::def::DefKind;
use rustc_index::bit_set::BitSet;
use rustc_index::vec::IndexVec;
use rustc_infer::infer::InferCtxt;
use rustc_middle::mir::abstract_const::{Node, NodeId};
use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::ErrorHandled;
use rustc_middle::mir::{self, Rvalue, StatementKind, TerminatorKind};
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::Subst;
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::SubstsRef;
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable};
use rustc_session::lint;
use rustc_span::def_id::{DefId, LocalDefId};
use rustc_span::Span;

use std::cmp;

/// Check if a given constant can be evaluated.
pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
    infcx: &InferCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
    def: ty::WithOptConstParam<DefId>,
    substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
    param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
    span: Span,
) -> Result<(), ErrorHandled> {
    debug!("is_const_evaluatable({:?}, {:?})", def, substs);
    if infcx.tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked {
        let tcx = infcx.tcx;
        match AbstractConst::new(tcx, def, substs)? {
            // We are looking at a generic abstract constant.
            Some(ct) => {
                for pred in param_env.caller_bounds() {
                    match pred.skip_binders() {
                        ty::PredicateAtom::ConstEvaluatable(b_def, b_substs) => {
                            debug!(
                                "is_const_evaluatable: caller_bound={:?}, {:?}",
                                b_def, b_substs
                            );
                            if b_def == def && b_substs == substs {
                                debug!("is_const_evaluatable: caller_bound ~~> ok");
                                return Ok(());
                            } else if AbstractConst::new(tcx, b_def, b_substs)?
                                .map_or(false, |b_ct| try_unify(tcx, ct, b_ct))
                            {
                                debug!("is_const_evaluatable: abstract_const ~~> ok");
                                return Ok(());
                            }
                        }
                        _ => {} // don't care
                    }
                }

                // We were unable to unify the abstract constant with
                // a constant found in the caller bounds, there are
                // now three possible cases here.
                //
                // - The substs are concrete enough that we can simply
                //   try and evaluate the given constant.
                // - The abstract const still references an inference
                //   variable, in this case we return `TooGeneric`.
                // - The abstract const references a generic parameter,
                //   this means that we emit an error here.
                #[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
                enum FailureKind {
                    MentionsInfer,
                    MentionsParam,
                    Concrete,
                }
                let mut failure_kind = FailureKind::Concrete;
                walk_abstract_const(tcx, ct, |node| match node {
                    Node::Leaf(leaf) => {
                        let leaf = leaf.subst(tcx, ct.substs);
                        if leaf.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
                            failure_kind = FailureKind::MentionsInfer;
                        } else if leaf.has_param_types_or_consts() {
                            failure_kind = cmp::min(failure_kind, FailureKind::MentionsParam);
                        }
                    }
                    Node::Binop(_, _, _) | Node::UnaryOp(_, _) | Node::FunctionCall(_, _) => (),
                });

                match failure_kind {
                    FailureKind::MentionsInfer => {
                        return Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric);
                    }
                    FailureKind::MentionsParam => {
                        // FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): Better error message.
                        infcx
                            .tcx
                            .sess
                            .struct_span_err(span, "unconstrained generic constant")
                            .span_help(
                                tcx.def_span(def.did),
                                "consider adding a `where` bound for this expression",
                            )
                            .emit();
                        return Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(ErrorReported));
                    }
                    FailureKind::Concrete => {
                        // Dealt with below by the same code which handles this
                        // without the feature gate.
                    }
                }
            }
            None => {
                // If we are dealing with a concrete constant, we can
                // reuse the old code path and try to evaluate
                // the constant.
            }
        }
    }

    let future_compat_lint = || {
        if let Some(local_def_id) = def.did.as_local() {
            infcx.tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(
                lint::builtin::CONST_EVALUATABLE_UNCHECKED,
                infcx.tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(local_def_id),
                span,
                |err| {
                    err.build("cannot use constants which depend on generic parameters in types")
                        .emit();
                },
            );
        }
    };

    // FIXME: We should only try to evaluate a given constant here if it is fully concrete
    // as we don't want to allow things like `[u8; std::mem::size_of::<*mut T>()]`.
    //
    // We previously did not check this, so we only emit a future compat warning if
    // const evaluation succeeds and the given constant is still polymorphic for now
    // and hopefully soon change this to an error.
    //
    // See #74595 for more details about this.
    let concrete = infcx.const_eval_resolve(param_env, def, substs, None, Some(span));

    if concrete.is_ok() && substs.has_param_types_or_consts() {
        match infcx.tcx.def_kind(def.did) {
            DefKind::AnonConst => {
                let mir_body = infcx.tcx.optimized_mir_of_opt_const_arg(def);

                if mir_body.is_polymorphic {
                    future_compat_lint();
                }
            }
            _ => future_compat_lint(),
        }
    }

    debug!(?concrete, "is_const_evaluatable");
    match concrete {
        Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric) if !substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() => {
            // FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We really should move
            // emitting this error message to fulfill instead. For
            // now this is easier.
            //
            // This is not a problem without `const_evaluatable_checked` as
            // all `ConstEvaluatable` predicates have to be fulfilled for compilation
            // to succeed.
            //
            // @lcnr: We already emit an error for things like
            // `fn test<const N: usize>() -> [0 - N]` eagerly here,
            // so until we fix this I don't really care.

            let mut err = infcx
                .tcx
                .sess
                .struct_span_err(span, "constant expression depends on a generic parameter");
            // FIXME(const_generics): we should suggest to the user how they can resolve this
            // issue. However, this is currently not actually possible
            // (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66962#issuecomment-575907083).
            //
            // Note that with `feature(const_evaluatable_checked)` this case should not
            // be reachable.
            err.note("this may fail depending on what value the parameter takes");
            err.emit();
            Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(ErrorReported))
        }
        c => c.map(drop),
    }
}

/// A tree representing an anonymous constant.
///
/// This is only able to represent a subset of `MIR`,
/// and should not leak any information about desugarings.
#[derive(Clone, Copy)]
pub struct AbstractConst<'tcx> {
    // FIXME: Consider adding something like `IndexSlice`
    // and use this here.
    inner: &'tcx [Node<'tcx>],
    substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
}

impl AbstractConst<'tcx> {
    pub fn new(
        tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
        def: ty::WithOptConstParam<DefId>,
        substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
    ) -> Result<Option<AbstractConst<'tcx>>, ErrorReported> {
        let inner = tcx.mir_abstract_const_of_opt_const_arg(def)?;
        Ok(inner.map(|inner| AbstractConst { inner, substs }))
    }

    #[inline]
    pub fn subtree(self, node: NodeId) -> AbstractConst<'tcx> {
        AbstractConst { inner: &self.inner[..=node.index()], substs: self.substs }
    }

    #[inline]
    pub fn root(self) -> Node<'tcx> {
        self.inner.last().copied().unwrap()
    }
}

struct AbstractConstBuilder<'a, 'tcx> {
    tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
    body: &'a mir::Body<'tcx>,
    /// The current WIP node tree.
    nodes: IndexVec<NodeId, Node<'tcx>>,
    locals: IndexVec<mir::Local, NodeId>,
    /// We only allow field accesses if they access
    /// the result of a checked operation.
    checked_op_locals: BitSet<mir::Local>,
}

impl<'a, 'tcx> AbstractConstBuilder<'a, 'tcx> {
    fn error(&mut self, span: Option<Span>, msg: &str) -> Result<!, ErrorReported> {
        self.tcx
            .sess
            .struct_span_err(self.body.span, "overly complex generic constant")
            .span_label(span.unwrap_or(self.body.span), msg)
            .help("consider moving this anonymous constant into a `const` function")
            .emit();

        Err(ErrorReported)
    }

    fn new(
        tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
        body: &'a mir::Body<'tcx>,
    ) -> Result<Option<AbstractConstBuilder<'a, 'tcx>>, ErrorReported> {
        let mut builder = AbstractConstBuilder {
            tcx,
            body,
            nodes: IndexVec::new(),
            locals: IndexVec::from_elem(NodeId::MAX, &body.local_decls),
            checked_op_locals: BitSet::new_empty(body.local_decls.len()),
        };

        // We don't have to look at concrete constants, as we
        // can just evaluate them.
        if !body.is_polymorphic {
            return Ok(None);
        }

        // We only allow consts without control flow, so
        // we check for cycles here which simplifies the
        // rest of this implementation.
        if body.is_cfg_cyclic() {
            builder.error(None, "cyclic anonymous constants are forbidden")?;
        }

        Ok(Some(builder))
    }

    fn place_to_local(
        &mut self,
        span: Span,
        p: &mir::Place<'tcx>,
    ) -> Result<mir::Local, ErrorReported> {
        const ZERO_FIELD: mir::Field = mir::Field::from_usize(0);
        // Do not allow any projections.
        //
        // One exception are field accesses on the result of checked operations,
        // which are required to support things like `1 + 2`.
        if let Some(p) = p.as_local() {
            debug_assert!(!self.checked_op_locals.contains(p));
            Ok(p)
        } else if let &[mir::ProjectionElem::Field(ZERO_FIELD, _)] = p.projection.as_ref() {
            // Only allow field accesses if the given local
            // contains the result of a checked operation.
            if self.checked_op_locals.contains(p.local) {
                Ok(p.local)
            } else {
                self.error(Some(span), "unsupported projection")?;
            }
        } else {
            self.error(Some(span), "unsupported projection")?;
        }
    }

    fn operand_to_node(
        &mut self,
        span: Span,
        op: &mir::Operand<'tcx>,
    ) -> Result<NodeId, ErrorReported> {
        debug!("operand_to_node: op={:?}", op);
        match op {
            mir::Operand::Copy(p) | mir::Operand::Move(p) => {
                let local = self.place_to_local(span, p)?;
                Ok(self.locals[local])
            }
            mir::Operand::Constant(ct) => Ok(self.nodes.push(Node::Leaf(ct.literal))),
        }
    }

    /// We do not allow all binary operations in abstract consts, so filter disallowed ones.
    fn check_binop(op: mir::BinOp) -> bool {
        use mir::BinOp::*;
        match op {
            Add | Sub | Mul | Div | Rem | BitXor | BitAnd | BitOr | Shl | Shr | Eq | Lt | Le
            | Ne | Ge | Gt => true,
            Offset => false,
        }
    }

    /// While we currently allow all unary operations, we still want to explicitly guard against
    /// future changes here.
    fn check_unop(op: mir::UnOp) -> bool {
        use mir::UnOp::*;
        match op {
            Not | Neg => true,
        }
    }

    fn build_statement(&mut self, stmt: &mir::Statement<'tcx>) -> Result<(), ErrorReported> {
        debug!("AbstractConstBuilder: stmt={:?}", stmt);
        match stmt.kind {
            StatementKind::Assign(box (ref place, ref rvalue)) => {
                let local = self.place_to_local(stmt.source_info.span, place)?;
                match *rvalue {
                    Rvalue::Use(ref operand) => {
                        self.locals[local] =
                            self.operand_to_node(stmt.source_info.span, operand)?;
                        Ok(())
                    }
                    Rvalue::BinaryOp(op, ref lhs, ref rhs) if Self::check_binop(op) => {
                        let lhs = self.operand_to_node(stmt.source_info.span, lhs)?;
                        let rhs = self.operand_to_node(stmt.source_info.span, rhs)?;
                        self.locals[local] = self.nodes.push(Node::Binop(op, lhs, rhs));
                        if op.is_checkable() {
                            bug!("unexpected unchecked checkable binary operation");
                        } else {
                            Ok(())
                        }
                    }
                    Rvalue::CheckedBinaryOp(op, ref lhs, ref rhs) if Self::check_binop(op) => {
                        let lhs = self.operand_to_node(stmt.source_info.span, lhs)?;
                        let rhs = self.operand_to_node(stmt.source_info.span, rhs)?;
                        self.locals[local] = self.nodes.push(Node::Binop(op, lhs, rhs));
                        self.checked_op_locals.insert(local);
                        Ok(())
                    }
                    Rvalue::UnaryOp(op, ref operand) if Self::check_unop(op) => {
                        let operand = self.operand_to_node(stmt.source_info.span, operand)?;
                        self.locals[local] = self.nodes.push(Node::UnaryOp(op, operand));
                        Ok(())
                    }
                    _ => self.error(Some(stmt.source_info.span), "unsupported rvalue")?,
                }
            }
            // These are not actually relevant for us here, so we can ignore them.
            StatementKind::StorageLive(_) | StatementKind::StorageDead(_) => Ok(()),
            _ => self.error(Some(stmt.source_info.span), "unsupported statement")?,
        }
    }

    /// Possible return values:
    ///
    /// - `None`: unsupported terminator, stop building
    /// - `Some(None)`: supported terminator, finish building
    /// - `Some(Some(block))`: support terminator, build `block` next
    fn build_terminator(
        &mut self,
        terminator: &mir::Terminator<'tcx>,
    ) -> Result<Option<mir::BasicBlock>, ErrorReported> {
        debug!("AbstractConstBuilder: terminator={:?}", terminator);
        match terminator.kind {
            TerminatorKind::Goto { target } => Ok(Some(target)),
            TerminatorKind::Return => Ok(None),
            TerminatorKind::Call {
                ref func,
                ref args,
                destination: Some((ref place, target)),
                // We do not care about `cleanup` here. Any branch which
                // uses `cleanup` will fail const-eval and they therefore
                // do not matter when checking for const evaluatability.
                //
                // Do note that even if `panic::catch_unwind` is made const,
                // we still do not have to care about this, as we do not look
                // into functions.
                cleanup: _,
                // Do not allow overloaded operators for now,
                // we probably do want to allow this in the future.
                //
                // This is currently fairly irrelevant as it requires `const Trait`s.
                from_hir_call: true,
                fn_span,
            } => {
                let local = self.place_to_local(fn_span, place)?;
                let func = self.operand_to_node(fn_span, func)?;
                let args = self.tcx.arena.alloc_from_iter(
                    args.iter()
                        .map(|arg| self.operand_to_node(terminator.source_info.span, arg))
                        .collect::<Result<Vec<NodeId>, _>>()?,
                );
                self.locals[local] = self.nodes.push(Node::FunctionCall(func, args));
                Ok(Some(target))
            }
            // We only allow asserts for checked operations.
            //
            // These asserts seem to all have the form `!_local.0` so
            // we only allow exactly that.
            TerminatorKind::Assert { ref cond, expected: false, target, .. } => {
                let p = match cond {
                    mir::Operand::Copy(p) | mir::Operand::Move(p) => p,
                    mir::Operand::Constant(_) => bug!("unexpected assert"),
                };

                const ONE_FIELD: mir::Field = mir::Field::from_usize(1);
                debug!("proj: {:?}", p.projection);
                if let &[mir::ProjectionElem::Field(ONE_FIELD, _)] = p.projection.as_ref() {
                    // Only allow asserts checking the result of a checked operation.
                    if self.checked_op_locals.contains(p.local) {
                        return Ok(Some(target));
                    }
                }

                self.error(Some(terminator.source_info.span), "unsupported assertion")?;
            }
            _ => self.error(Some(terminator.source_info.span), "unsupported terminator")?,
        }
    }

    /// Builds the abstract const by walking the mir from start to finish
    /// and bailing out when encountering an unsupported operation.
    fn build(mut self) -> Result<&'tcx [Node<'tcx>], ErrorReported> {
        let mut block = &self.body.basic_blocks()[mir::START_BLOCK];
        // We checked for a cyclic cfg above, so this should terminate.
        loop {
            debug!("AbstractConstBuilder: block={:?}", block);
            for stmt in block.statements.iter() {
                self.build_statement(stmt)?;
            }

            if let Some(next) = self.build_terminator(block.terminator())? {
                block = &self.body.basic_blocks()[next];
            } else {
                return Ok(self.tcx.arena.alloc_from_iter(self.nodes));
            }
        }
    }
}

/// Builds an abstract const, do not use this directly, but use `AbstractConst::new` instead.
pub(super) fn mir_abstract_const<'tcx>(
    tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
    def: ty::WithOptConstParam<LocalDefId>,
) -> Result<Option<&'tcx [mir::abstract_const::Node<'tcx>]>, ErrorReported> {
    if tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked {
        match tcx.def_kind(def.did) {
            // FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We currently only do this for anonymous constants,
            // meaning that we do not look into associated constants. I(@lcnr) am not yet sure whether
            // we want to look into them or treat them as opaque projections.
            //
            // Right now we do neither of that and simply always fail to unify them.
            DefKind::AnonConst => (),
            _ => return Ok(None),
        }
        let body = tcx.mir_const(def).borrow();
        AbstractConstBuilder::new(tcx, &body)?.map(AbstractConstBuilder::build).transpose()
    } else {
        Ok(None)
    }
}

pub(super) fn try_unify_abstract_consts<'tcx>(
    tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
    ((a, a_substs), (b, b_substs)): (
        (ty::WithOptConstParam<DefId>, SubstsRef<'tcx>),
        (ty::WithOptConstParam<DefId>, SubstsRef<'tcx>),
    ),
) -> bool {
    (|| {
        if let Some(a) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, a, a_substs)? {
            if let Some(b) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, b, b_substs)? {
                return Ok(try_unify(tcx, a, b));
            }
        }

        Ok(false)
    })()
    .unwrap_or_else(|ErrorReported| true)
    // FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We should instead have this
    // method return the resulting `ty::Const` and return `ConstKind::Error`
    // on `ErrorReported`.
}

fn walk_abstract_const<'tcx, F>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, ct: AbstractConst<'tcx>, mut f: F)
where
    F: FnMut(Node<'tcx>),
{
    recurse(tcx, ct, &mut f);
    fn recurse<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, ct: AbstractConst<'tcx>, f: &mut dyn FnMut(Node<'tcx>)) {
        let root = ct.root();
        f(root);
        match root {
            Node::Leaf(_) => (),
            Node::Binop(_, l, r) => {
                recurse(tcx, ct.subtree(l), f);
                recurse(tcx, ct.subtree(r), f);
            }
            Node::UnaryOp(_, v) => {
                recurse(tcx, ct.subtree(v), f);
            }
            Node::FunctionCall(func, args) => {
                recurse(tcx, ct.subtree(func), f);
                for &arg in args {
                    recurse(tcx, ct.subtree(arg), f);
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

/// Tries to unify two abstract constants using structural equality.
pub(super) fn try_unify<'tcx>(
    tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
    a: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
    b: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
) -> bool {
    match (a.root(), b.root()) {
        (Node::Leaf(a_ct), Node::Leaf(b_ct)) => {
            let a_ct = a_ct.subst(tcx, a.substs);
            let b_ct = b_ct.subst(tcx, b.substs);
            match (a_ct.val, b_ct.val) {
                // We can just unify errors with everything to reduce the amount of
                // emitted errors here.
                (ty::ConstKind::Error(_), _) | (_, ty::ConstKind::Error(_)) => true,
                (ty::ConstKind::Param(a_param), ty::ConstKind::Param(b_param)) => {
                    a_param == b_param
                }
                (ty::ConstKind::Value(a_val), ty::ConstKind::Value(b_val)) => a_val == b_val,
                // If we have `fn a<const N: usize>() -> [u8; N + 1]` and `fn b<const M: usize>() -> [u8; 1 + M]`
                // we do not want to use `assert_eq!(a(), b())` to infer that `N` and `M` have to be `1`. This
                // means that we only allow inference variables if they are equal.
                (ty::ConstKind::Infer(a_val), ty::ConstKind::Infer(b_val)) => a_val == b_val,
                // FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We may want to either actually try
                // to evaluate `a_ct` and `b_ct` if they are are fully concrete or something like
                // this, for now we just return false here.
                _ => false,
            }
        }
        (Node::Binop(a_op, al, ar), Node::Binop(b_op, bl, br)) if a_op == b_op => {
            try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(al), b.subtree(bl))
                && try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(ar), b.subtree(br))
        }
        (Node::UnaryOp(a_op, av), Node::UnaryOp(b_op, bv)) if a_op == b_op => {
            try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(av), b.subtree(bv))
        }
        (Node::FunctionCall(a_f, a_args), Node::FunctionCall(b_f, b_args))
            if a_args.len() == b_args.len() =>
        {
            try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(a_f), b.subtree(b_f))
                && a_args
                    .iter()
                    .zip(b_args)
                    .all(|(&an, &bn)| try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(an), b.subtree(bn)))
        }
        _ => false,
    }
}