Spelling - compiler
* account * achieved * advising * always * ambiguous * analysis * annotations * appropriate * build * candidates * cascading * category * character * clarification * compound * conceptually * constituent * consts * convenience * corresponds * debruijn * debug * debugable * debuggable * deterministic * discriminant * display * documentation * doesn't * ellipsis * erroneous * evaluability * evaluate * evaluation * explicitly * fallible * fulfill * getting * has * highlighting * illustrative * imported * incompatible * infringing * initialized * into * intrinsic * introduced * javascript * liveness * metadata * monomorphization * nonexistent * nontrivial * obligation * obligations * offset * opaque * opportunities * opt-in * outlive * overlapping * paragraph * parentheses * poisson * precisely * predecessors * predicates * preexisting * propagated * really * reentrant * referent * responsibility * rustonomicon * shortcircuit * simplifiable * simplifications * specify * stabilized * structurally * suggestibility * translatable * transmuting * two * unclosed * uninhabited * visibility * volatile * workaround Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
31656e7295
commit
e09d0d2a29
101 changed files with 159 additions and 159 deletions
|
@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// We sometimes have to use `defining_opaque_types` for subtyping
|
||||
// to succeed here and figuring out how exactly that should work
|
||||
// is annoying. It is harmless enough to just not validate anything
|
||||
// in that case. We still check this after analysis as all opque
|
||||
// in that case. We still check this after analysis as all opaque
|
||||
// types have been revealed at this point.
|
||||
if (src, dest).has_opaque_types() {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue