Rename ACTIVE_FEATURES
as UNSTABLE_FEATURES
.
It's a better name, and lets "active features" refer to the features that are active in a particular program, due to being declared or enabled by the edition. The commit also renames `Features::enabled` as `Features::active` to match this; I changed my mind and have decided that "active" is a little better thatn "enabled" for this, particularly because a number of pre-existing comments use "active" in this way. Finally, the commit renames `Status::Stable` as `Status::Accepted`, to match `ACCEPTED_FEATURES`.
This commit is contained in:
parent
41b6899487
commit
d284c8a2d7
14 changed files with 199 additions and 201 deletions
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ macro_rules! declare_features {
|
|||
($(
|
||||
$(#[doc = $doc:tt])* (accepted, $feature:ident, $ver:expr, $issue:expr, None),
|
||||
)+) => {
|
||||
/// Those language feature has since been Accepted (it was once Active)
|
||||
/// Formerly unstable features that have now been accepted (stabilized).
|
||||
pub const ACCEPTED_FEATURES: &[Feature] = &[
|
||||
$(Feature {
|
||||
name: sym::$feature,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue