diff --git a/library/core/src/pin.rs b/library/core/src/pin.rs
index eb9c0818f17..b4c2e65ad70 100644
--- a/library/core/src/pin.rs
+++ b/library/core/src/pin.rs
@@ -753,9 +753,11 @@
//! 1. *Structural [`Unpin`].* A struct can be [`Unpin`] if, and only if, all of its
//! structurally-pinned fields are, too. This is [`Unpin`]'s behavior by default.
//! However, as a libray author, it is your responsibility not to write something like
-//! unsafe impl\ [Unpin] for Struct\ {}
. (Adding *any* projection
-//! operation requires unsafe code, so the fact that [`Unpin`] is a safe trait does not break
-//! the principle that you only have to worry about any of this if you use [`unsafe`].)
+//! impl\ [Unpin] for Struct\ {}
and then offer a method that provides
+//! structural pinning to an inner field of `T`, which may not be [`Unpin`]! (Adding *any*
+//! projection operation requires unsafe code, so the fact that [`Unpin`] is a safe trait does
+//! not break the principle that you only have to worry about any of this if you use
+//! [`unsafe`].)
//!
//! 2. *Pinned Destruction.* As discussed [above][drop-impl], [`drop`] takes
//! [`&mut self`], but the struct (and hence its fields) might have been pinned
@@ -764,14 +766,14 @@
//!
//! As a consequence, the struct *must not* be [`#[repr(packed)]`][packed].
//!
-//! 3. *Structural Notice of Destruction.* You must uphold the the [`Drop` guarantee][drop-guarantee]:
-//! once your struct is pinned, the struct's storage cannot be re-used without calling the
-//! structurally-pinned fields' destructors, as well.
+//! 3. *Structural Notice of Destruction.* You must uphold the the
+//! [`Drop` guarantee][drop-guarantee]: once your struct is pinned, the struct's storage cannot
+//! be re-used without calling the structurally-pinned fields' destructors, as well.
//!
//! This can be tricky, as witnessed by [`VecDeque`]: the destructor of [`VecDeque`]
//! can fail to call [`drop`] on all elements if one of the destructors panics. This violates
-//! the [`Drop` guarantee][drop-guarantee], because it can lead to elements being deallocated without
-//! their destructor being called.
+//! the [`Drop` guarantee][drop-guarantee], because it can lead to elements being deallocated
+//! without their destructor being called.
//!
//! [`VecDeque`] has no pinning projections, so its destructor is sound. If it wanted
//! to provide such structural pinning, its destructor would need to abort the process if any