diff --git a/src/doc/unstable-book/src/language-features/unsized-locals.md b/src/doc/unstable-book/src/language-features/unsized-locals.md index ff5a6bcfbf7..f779edc89e7 100644 --- a/src/doc/unstable-book/src/language-features/unsized-locals.md +++ b/src/doc/unstable-book/src/language-features/unsized-locals.md @@ -127,13 +127,13 @@ One of the objectives of this feature is to allow `Box`, instead of ## Variable length arrays -The RFC also describes an extension to the array literal syntax `[e; n]`: you'll be able to specify non-const `n` to allocate variable length arrays on the stack. +The RFC also describes an extension to the array literal syntax: `[e; dyn n]`. In the syntax, `n` isn't necessarily a constant expression. The array is dynamically allocated on the stack and has the type of `[T]`, instead of `[T; n]`. ```rust,ignore #![feature(unsized_locals)] fn mergesort(a: &mut [T]) { - let mut tmp = [T; a.len()]; + let mut tmp = [T; dyn a.len()]; // ... } @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ fn main() { } ``` -VLAs are not implemented yet. +VLAs are not implemented yet. The syntax isn't final, either. We may need an alternative syntax for Rust 2015 because, in Rust 2015, expressions like `[e; dyn(1)]` would be ambiguous. One possible alternative proposed in the RFC is `[e; n]`: if `n` captures one or more local variables, then it is considered as `[e; dyn n]`. ## Advisory on stack usage